Trek's first go at a trail hardtail hits the mark with a quality frame, balanced handling and well thought out spec plus a fun and lively ride
Apr 9 2018
Sweet handling, well made and nicely featured aluminium frame
Coherent kit, including smooth drivetrain and dropper post as standard
Plus tyres help smooth out bumps for better comfort and traction
Brakes are a bit weak and wooden
Lightly treaded tyres struggle in mud
More aggressive riders might want more reach and slacker angles
You're after a fun, all-round trail hardtail that won't break the bank
Trek's Roscoe 9 marries an aluminium frame with trail riding orientated geometry to chubby 2.8" Plus tyres on 27.5" rims. While it doesn't jam in as much value as direct sales rivals, it more than makes up for that with a fun, refined ride and coherent kit list.
The Roscoe is a bit of a departure for Trek. It's the first time they've had a serious go at the trail hardtail, with their previous bikes around this money being very cross-country focused efforts. It's also their first hardtail with fat Plus tyres. The Roscoe 9 is the most expensive bike in the range but it shares a shapely frame made from Trek's Alpha Gold aluminium with the other two cheaper models. As it comes with a tapered headtube, routing for an internal dropper post and Boost wheel spacing, that's an entirely positive thing.
Up front, there's 120mm of travel from a lockout-equipped RockShox Recon Solo Air fork. It's not the last word in low weight or bling thanks to the steel upper tubes, but it's respectably stiff and accurate thanks to Boost spacing and the damping can take a good bit of hammer before it loses its mind over repeated big hits. That's helped by the fat 2.8" Schwalbe rubber, which also helps cushion you impressively at the rear end, although the slender, unbraced stays probably help a bit there as well as offering masses of mud clearance.
The tyres are mounted on 40mm internal width Sun Duroc SL rims. They've proved to be durable while I've been testing the bike and, while they don't come tubeless ready, it is possible to convert them with a kit that's available separately and the Schwalbe Rocket Ron rubber is ready to go from the off. The hubs both use sealed bearings and come with Boost spacing, though as there's a standard quick-release axle at the rear, that gets the rather confusing Boost 141 moniker rather than the more familiar Boost 148 naming of 12mm through-axle equipped bikes.
The drivetrain is a dependable mix of Shimano's 11spd kit, with an SLX shifter and wide-range 11-46T cassette with the theoretical sweetener of a clutch equipped XT-level mech, not that it makes much difference in practice. That's paired with a set of Race Face Aeffect cranks with a nicely matched 28T direct mount narrow-wide single chainring. From experience, the Shimano kit shifts more smoothly if less quickly than SRAM's gear and it's very durable in the long term too. The big jump in ratios between the biggest 46T cog on the cassette and the next one down is very noticeable when compared to the more even steps of SRAM's 11spd cassette, but I did find myself compensating over time.
Elsewhere on the bike, there's finishing kit from the Bontrager stable, which is no bad thing. The 750mm wide low rise handlebar is a good shape and while the 60mm stem isn't exactly super-progressive, it's not too rudder-like and can be easily switched if needed. A really welcome bit of spec is the Bontrager dropper post. It might only have 125mm of travel but that's generally enough to get it out of the way on descents and it's internally routed, so there aren't any cables flapping about. This test one has stayed solid and the remote is really pleasant to use, but I have had mixed results with reliability in the past, however.
So how does the Roscoe ride?
While the Roscoe is definitely more trail orientated than Trek's other mid-priced hardtails, the geometry is still fairly conventional, with a 68.3º head angle on the 51mm offset fork. At 71º, the seat angle is pretty damn slack by modern standards, which does mean you have more weight over the rear wheel when sat on steeper climbs. The relatively short 100mm headtube keeps the front end low, while the bottom bracket drop of 58mm gives a nice low slung feel in the corners. I'm 173cm tall but I had enough standover to ride a 19.5" frame, which gave a reach of 438mm. That's not hugely spacious, but in combination with the slack seat angle it means you get a decent effective top tube length when sat down, so there's decent enough breathing room when pedalling on the flat.
That said, when you're riding the Roscoe, it really doesn't feel too cramped. It's no super slack aggro machine, but you can maintain a fair lick of speed on techy and steep trails without it all getting sketchy too quickly. Okay, it's definitely a rolling singletrack and trail centre machine rather than a steep and technical smasher such as Whyte's slacker and longer 900 series hardtails but it's still capable and competent with a lively, agile feel that'll satisfy all but the most hardcore shredders. Despite the 13.6kg weight, it actually rides like a much lighter bike, which I'm guessing is largely down to the bump smoothing, undamped and speedy rolling rubber.
In muddy conditions, you can reach the limits of the fairly shallow tread of the Rocket Ron tyres, but a 50a rubber compound means they're not too sketchy on wet rocks and roots. As with all Plus tyres, getting the tyre pressure is critical as one or two psi the wrong way makes a big difference. Too high and you'll have little traction and get pinged all over the place, too soft and the carcass will roll a disturbing amount when cornering. Get it right - I'd suggest buying a digital gauge to make sure you do - and you get a good mix of comfort and traction with acceptable precision. The casing is pretty light so serious rock-smashing abuse will end badly, but by that point, you'll have probably shaken your fillings out due to the lack of spring at the back anyway. It's always worth remembering you can pop in a set of 29" wheels and tyres should you wish as well.
The bike has got fairly basic Shimano M365 stoppers. They do an acceptable enough job thanks to a 180mm rotor up front in addition to the 160mm item at the back but the four-finger lever is a bit clunky and lacking in feel compared to higher end stoppers in the Shimano catalogue. You're limited to fast wearing resin pads rather than more durable sintered versions too.
Minor grumblings aside, Trek has done a very good job with the Roscoe 9. The geometry strikes a good balance between traditional and twitchy cross-country machines and more aggressively angled trail bikes that'll suit people that don't just want to slog out the miles or chuck themselves down the silliest stuff they can find. If that sounds like it's a bit of a Jack of all trades, then yes it is, but that'll suit a lot of people.
When it comes to the kit bolted to it, even a massive company like Trek struggles to match the value direct sales brands can offer, but it's a credit to them that there are very few missteps and everything works coherently. Having a dropper post, smooth drivetrain, decent rims and a well-controlled if hefty fork on a quality frame means it works well out of the box as well as being a good place to start upgrading affordably as needed. If you want a fun, all-round trail hardtail without breaking the bank, the Roscoe 9 hits the spot.
Tell us what the bike is for, and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own :
Trek say: The Roscoe 9 is our top-end 27.5+ trail hardtail. It's a fun-loving ride with high-performance mountain bike parts that are ready to get rowdy. The mid-fat tyres and burly suspension fork with 120 mm of travel offer an extra dose of confidence to any rider on any trail.
State the frame material and method of construction. List the components used to build up the bike.:
FrameAlpha Gold Aluminium, E2 tapered head tube, internal derailleur and dropper post routing, rack and kickstand mount, Boost141, G2 Geometry
Front suspensionRockShox Recon, Solo Air, TurnKey lockout, rebound, E2 tapered steerer, G2 Geometry w/51 mm offset, Boost110, 120 mm travel (13.5: 100 mm travel)
Front HubBontrager sealed bearing, alloy axle, Boost110
Rear HubBontrager sealed bearing, Boost141
RimsSUNringlé Duroc 40 SL 28-hole, tubeless strips and valves sold separately
TyresSchwalbe Rocket Ron Performance, tubeless, aramid bead, 27.5x2.80˝
ShiftersShimano SLX M7000, 11-speed
Rear derailleurShimano Deore XT M8000, Shadow Plus
CrankRace Face Aeffect, 28T Direct Mount Narrow-Wide
Bottom bracketSealed cartridge
CassetteShimano SLX M7000, 11-46, 11-speed
PedalsWellgo nylon platform
SaddleBontrager Evoke 1.5
SeatpostDropper post, Bontrager lever, 31.6 mm, internal routing
HandlebarBontrager alloy, 31.8 mm, 15 mm rise
GripsBontrager Race Lite, lock-on
StemBontrager Rhythm Comp, 31.8 mm, 0-degree
Head setSemi-integrated, 1-1/8˝ top, 1.5˝ bottom
Brake setShimano M365 hydraulic disc
Frame & Fork
How much suspension travel does the fork have?:
How was the bike in terms of sizing and angles? How did it compare to other bikes of the same stated size and intent?:
It's on the conservative side compared to the likes of Whyte, but relative to Trek's previous mid-range hardtails it's positively progressive. They've played it pretty safe and it'll work for everyone except for the most balls-to-the-wall shredders.
Overall rating for frame
Tell us about the build quality and finish of the frame:
Nice features including neat external cable routing for everything but the rear mech, masses of mud clearance.
Tell us about the geometry of the frame:
For the 19.5":
Head angle: 68.3
Seat angle: 71
Tell us about the materials used in the frame:
Trk's Alpha Gold aluminium
Rate the bike for sprinting:
Rate the bike for high speed descending
Rate the bike for technical descending:
Rate the bike for flat cornering:
Rate the bike for technical climbing:
Rate the bike for climbing efficiency:
Rate the bike for agility:
Rate the fork for performance:
Rate the fork for durability:
Rate the fork for efficiency:
Rate the fork for value:
Rate the drivetrain for performance:
Rate the drivetrain for durability:
Rate the drivetrain for weight:
Rate the drivetrain for value:
Wheels & tyres
Rate the wheels for performance:
Rate the wheels for durability:
Rate the wheels for weight:
Rate the wheels for comfort:
Rate the wheels for value:
Rate the tyres for performance:
Rate the tyres for durability:
Rate the tyres for weight:
Rate the controls for performance:
Rate the controls for durability:
Rate the controls for comfort:
Did you enjoy riding the bike?:
Yeah, it's a fun little singletrack machine with plenty of pop and good manners on everything except the really steep stuff
Would you consider buying the bike?:
If I was after an all round machine, I'd be tempted
Would you recommend the bike to a friend?:
Yeah, as long as they weren't an absolute hooligan
Jon is the editor here at off.road.cc. Whether it's big days out on the gravel bike or hurtling down technical singletracks, if it's got two wheels and can be ridden on dirt, then he's into it. He's previously been technical editor at BikeRadar.com, editor at What Mountain Bike Magazine and also web editor at Singletrackworld.co.uk. Yes, he's been around the houses.